Search for: "Arnold B Sellers"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
The third and fourth websites were operated by UK re-sellers of the circumvention devices. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:47 pm
The patent in question is US 549,160 issued in 1895 to a Rochester lawyer named George B. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Given that the Court of Appeal in this case reached its decision in favour of Mr Wood with reference to the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in (Arnold v Britton & Ors [2015] UKSC 36), which held (in brief) that business common sense only had a part to play where the meaning of a term is ambiguous, how the Court’s decision in this case aligns with its recent decision in Arnold will be of keen interest to contract lawyers and litigators alike. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 5:04 am
In this case, the Arnolds are alternative tortfeasors, meaning that once plaintiff recovered from the sellers, he can not recover from the Arnolds. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:37 am
Under the circumstances of the main proceedings that effect is to be presumed unless the offer concerns a single item or few items offered by a seller clearly not acting in the course of trade [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:49 am
Where the claimant would have 'sold' the confidential information but for the breach, he could recover the market value of the information as between a willing seller and a willing buyer. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 1:17 pm
The case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Arnold B. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 7:18 am
An individual buyer should insist that the seller furnish the provenance (i.e., where he got it, who the prior owners were, etc.), but a provenance can be faked. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 2:29 pm
Arnold-Peter Weiss, was detained.New York Criminal Court records reveal that authorities on January 3, 2012 at 2:15 p.m. arrested and charged a man named Arnold Peter C. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
AmeriKat looks at the Court of Justice of the European Union response to Arnold J's questions in Case C-567/16 which held that an end of procedure notice does not amount to a granted marketing authorization for purposes of Article 3(b). [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 6:43 am
Arnold Palmer Golf Co. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 3:24 pm
The High Court said that it followed Arnold v Brittan on contractual interpretation, and then read the agreements as a whole, in context. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
He criticised Motors’ proof of use evidence, meaning its likelihood of confusion (5(2)(b)) case failed. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
It transpires that any seller may use another’s listing – identified by a unique ASIN and EAN – to sell the same product as the original seller. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
Eleonora tells all.* No substitute for the real thing: Bonningtons and friends prepare for Battle of the Button“Substitute sellers” take advantage of systems on online sales platforms which enable their users to list their own products under existing listings for identical products by supplying their own branded products or generic unbranded products under listings for other brands. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
Mrs Justice Falk ordered an injunction, not satisfied by the limited form of undertakings Samsung had offered and not persuaded to do otherwise in response to Samsung’s concerns that a standard injunction would leave them in an uncertain position.The judge did grant permission to appeal in respect of (a) the correct approach for app stores in relation to Article 14 of the e-Commerce Directive and a question on knowledge under that Article; and (b) several issues around… [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 11:20 am
Rather, he considered that Mr Justice Arnold had given due attention to this factor but have nevertheless still concluded that the overall impressions produced by the two designs were different. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm
Effectively, a re-seller. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am
Columnist Jonathan Cohn asked him: “under senate bill, can states opt out of (a) medicaid expansion (b) exchanges? [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
., Appellee. 1st District.Administrative law -- Agency for Health Care Administration -- Revocation of assisted living facility licenses, denial of licensure renewal applications, and imposition of administrative fines -- Claims against licensee were not proven where only evidence to support claims was uncorroborated hearsay -- Claim that licensee operated another assisted living facility without obtaining a valid license or qualifying for a license exemption was not proven where evidence was… [read post]
